[389-users] Clarification on admin server and console

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Aug 17 18:39:17 UTC 2010


Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
>> Something else occurred to me. If you have a shared/replicated NetscapeRoot database and lets say 12 servers over 3 datacentres, 6 providers and 6 consumers. >You will end up with 12 servers in a multimaster group for the netscaperoot database but only 6 servers in a multi master setup for the userdata database. That >seems quite a lot of masters for NetscapeRoot. Is that considered to many and/or is there any recommendations when having that many servers?
>>     
>
> To have all changes only 1 server away you need 28 replication agreements for 6 servers. Well at least for the userdb, 12 servers requieres LOT more replication agreements if you want changes replicating immediately to all servers. 24 Agreements if you are replicating sequentially. A lot more if you want all servers to replicate to all servers.
> I guess one can live with NetscapeRoot changes taking a few minutes to arrive everywhere.
>   
NetscapeRoot changes are not frequent and are usually small.
> Regards
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from 
> MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>   




More information about the 389-users mailing list