[389-users] Can an admin server manage remote directory servers?
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Sep 11 15:34:50 UTC 2012
On 09/11/2012 09:24 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Can an admin server manage remote directory servers? The docs always
> seems to refer to running an admin server alongside the directory
> server, but in the case of running a slave directory server, it would
> be nice to be able to manage that from the admin server on our main
> directory server machine. Is that possible?
No. Every machine must have 1 admin server (389-admin).
>
> Also, should the instance name of the slave server be different than
> the instance name of the primary server? It doesn't seem to be a
> requirement, and I'm not sure what is more or less confusing.
It's probably easier to search for it if the name is unique, but I don't
think it will break the console.
>
> Thanks!
>
More information about the 389-users
mailing list