[389-users] Problems with replication
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Oct 15 13:48:34 UTC 2013
On 10/15/2013 07:39 AM, Parasit Hendersson wrote:
> W dniu 2013-10-15 15:24, Rich Megginson pisze:
>>
>>> A given solution in this case it does not help, i made (again)
>>> initialization and the effect is exactly the same. What else can be
>>> wrong?
>>
>> You initialized the server "slave port 389" from the server "master
>> port 389" and you still get "Replica has a different generation ID"?
>
> Yes, in 389 console, in "Configuration" tab, "Replication" in menu
> tree, right click on replication agrement -> "Initialize Consumer"
> (all data will be erased, etc) finally OK. Last status - "Total update
> suceeded"
> I also try from console by ldapmodify, but now i dont remember all
> used comands.
Ok. Please show excerpts from the supplier and consumer errors logs
showing this happening.
>>
>>> Usually all changes from master are properly replicated, with some
>>> unexplained exceptions and i don't know why.
>>
>> If you are getting "Replica has a different generation ID" then
>> nothing should be replicating from "master port 389" to "slave port
>> 389".
>>
>
> I know, its strange, but lots entries are replicated :/
Do you have more than one master? Is the slave getting updates from
another master?
>
> With Regards
> Parasit Hendersson
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
More information about the 389-users
mailing list