[389-users] 1.2.11.29 prediction?

[Michael Gettes]

Yeah, I hear what you’re saying.  47758 is due to running bleeding edge, i get it.  but i had to go there cuz I was having problems with objects getting messed up with .15 in production and even .25 in test and I went to .28 which had the SASL fix on top of .26 which fixed all object problems.  The object problems were the emails I sent to the list indicating objects I couldn’t delete or modify and .28 fixed those problems.  This is where i feel i was a little trapped and had to come forward to the bleeding edge.  there was a method to my madness and didn’t this just willy nilly and hence where i was hoping for .29 to i might have a good mix of things - even if it was on the bleeding edge.  i hope this makes sense.

/mrg

On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:

> And that problem is entirely due to running "bleeding edge" software - a new patch/feature urgently requested to be in EL6.6 that we didn't completely backport to epel6.  If you were running the standard 389-ds-base in EL6.5 you would not have seen this issue. The 389-ds-base in epel6 contains patches intended for EL6.6 but which have not yet been fully tested.  The only way you could get into a real bind is if you have run into an issue due to be fixed in EL6.6 that you urgently need and can't wait for it to be released through the usual EL6.6 channels.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20140403/d2ff8f15/attachment.html>