[389-users] 1.2.11.29 prediction?

[Rich Megginson]

On 04/03/2014 01:35 PM, Michael Gettes wrote:
> Yeah, I hear what you’re saying.  47758 is due to running bleeding 
> edge, i get it.  but i had to go there cuz I was having problems with 
> objects getting messed up with .15 in production and even .25 in test 
> and I went to .28 which had the SASL fix on top of .26 which fixed all 
> object problems.  The object problems were the emails I sent to the 
> list indicating objects I couldn’t delete or modify and .28 fixed 
> those problems.  This is where i feel i was a little trapped and had 
> to come forward to the bleeding edge.  there was a method to my 
> madness and didn’t this just willy nilly and hence where i was hoping 
> for .29 to i might have a good mix of things - even if it was on the 
> bleeding edge.  i hope this makes sense.

Yes, and we are working on fixing those issues in EL6.6.  So perhaps 
when EL6.6 is released you will be able to use the OS packages.

>
> /mrg
>
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com 
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> And that problem is entirely due to running "bleeding edge" software 
>> - a new patch/feature urgently requested to be in EL6.6 that we 
>> didn't completely backport to epel6.  If you were running the 
>> standard 389-ds-base in EL6.5 you would not have seen this issue. The 
>> 389-ds-base in epel6 contains patches intended for EL6.6 but which 
>> have not yet been fully tested.  The only way you could get into a 
>> real bind is if you have run into an issue due to be fixed in EL6.6 
>> that you urgently need and can't wait for it to be released through 
>> the usual EL6.6 channels.
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20140403/aa210ac8/attachment.html>