[389-users] 1.2.11.29 prediction?

[Michael Gettes]

ok, i understand.

thank you.

/mrg

On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/03/2014 01:35 PM, Michael Gettes wrote:
>> Yeah, I hear what you’re saying.  47758 is due to running bleeding edge, i get it.  but i had to go there cuz I was having problems with objects getting messed up with .15 in production and even .25 in test and I went to .28 which had the SASL fix on top of .26 which fixed all object problems.  The object problems were the emails I sent to the list indicating objects I couldn’t delete or modify and .28 fixed those problems.  This is where i feel i was a little trapped and had to come forward to the bleeding edge.  there was a method to my madness and didn’t this just willy nilly and hence where i was hoping for .29 to i might have a good mix of things - even if it was on the bleeding edge.  i hope this makes sense.
> 
> Yes, and we are working on fixing those issues in EL6.6.  So perhaps when EL6.6 is released you will be able to use the OS packages.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20140403/68e1e521/attachment.html>