[389-users] glue entry problem

[David Hall]

Hi,

Please remove me from this list.

Thank you,

David
On 23 Apr 2014, at 15:14, Elizabeth Jones <bajones at panix.com> wrote:

> 
>> 
>> You mentioned 2 servers ldap1 and ldap2.  Are they both masters? You put
>> "local consumer" to ldap2.  Does that mean ldap2 is a read only replica?
> 
> We have two data centers and each data center has an ldap1 and ldap2.  All
> 4 are masters, but we only ever send updates to DCA-ldap1.  That then
> pushes to DCA-ldap2 and to DCB-ldap1.  DCB-ldap1 pushes to DCB-ldap2, so
> the ldap2's are really functioning as consumers all the time.
> 
>> 
>> It looks to me ldap1 got broken and ldap2 is still healthy.  You may
>> want to make ldap1 in sync with ldap2 and start from there. If ldap2 is
>> a master,  you could re-initialize ldap1 from ldap2.
>> 
>> If ldap2 is a read only replica, you could export the contents with
>> db2ldif -r -n <your_backend> command line utility on ldap2 and import
>> the exported ldif file to ldap1.
>> 
>> Or if you don't mind losing the replication information such as
>> tombstones and state info, you could export the contents without "-r" by
>> db2ldif on ldap2 and import the ldif file to ldap1, then re-initialize
>> ldap2 on ldap1.
>> 
>> Hope you could choose one of the 3 ways and it fixes the problem.
> 
> I will give this a shot.  When we tried to initialize these last week the
> initialization emptied out the receiving ldap and I believe that was a bug
> that is fixed in 1.3.  I recovered by using a backup but I don't want to
> try initializing again until we can upgrade to 1.3. Can I still do the
> ldif on ldap2, since it is actually a master rather than a read only
> replica?
> 
> Thanks,
> EJ
> 
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users