[fab] Packaging Committee/FESCo communication

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Jul 6 19:51:20 UTC 2006


On Thursday 06 July 2006 14:32, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I realize that there are members of FESCo on the Packaging Committee.
> And it's not as if I think the Packaging Committee is a bad idea, or are
> doing things wrong.  However I think the communication channels between
> the two committees should be a bit more than "here's your new
> guidelines,  enjoy."
>
> Thoughts, comments?

It should be up to the FESCO representation in the Packaging committee to keep 
FESCO abreast of whats to be discussed, how it effects Extras and what 
FESCO's opinions might be.  Ditto for Red Hat's representative re Red Hats 
interest (for Core and RHEL).  Its also the representatives responsibility to 
bring new issues brought up by FESCO, or Red Hat, to the packaging committee 
to discuss.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20060706/8ab82e99/attachment.bin 


More information about the advisory-board mailing list