[fab] A real communication problem
Rahul
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Mon Jul 10 20:20:19 UTC 2006
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Since we're on the subject of communication problems, as well as loading
> up on issues for the next meeting, let me point out another large safari
> animal camped out in the living room watching the big-screen HDTV.
> Observations:
>
> 1. We (Docs) were "promised" (well, maybe not promised, but certainly a
> commitment was made) OPL'd versions of Red Hat documentation to seed an
> upswing in Fedora Docs work. Creating this stuff from scratch is damn
> difficult work, and this was going to benefit Fedora and Red Hat
> equally, since the community can keep it up to date at a more rapid
> pace. Not only have we not received anything, but there's no word on
> when it will happen.
>
> 2. Translation/Infrastructure in Red Hat was supposed to provide a
> gateway or integration with the translation system (i18n.redhat.com) for
> docs stuff. This would ease the burden on our community translators to
> learn different systems, which is a real PITA for those who are already
> giving so much of their time. Again, no word.
>
> 3. The Translation management (same team?) is not responding to our
> repeated queries for help getting the release notes into i18n.redhat.com
> for this test cycle from now (FC6t2) until FC6 gold, notwithstanding #2
> above. Karsten has posted these requests on f-trans-l and there's
> nothing but silence from the other end.
>
> We're also not getting any response on status, and my understanding is
> both Karsten and Rahul have pinged people about this stuff several times
> without results. If I've misstated anything here, I hope either or both
> of them will step in and correct me.
I have asked again now for a status update on the docs relicensing which
was supposed to be given a week or so before. I have no clue about the
I18N relates issue and I havent tracked them.
>
> Otherwise, it's time to take this issue to the next level. Comments?
>
Max Spevack and Mathew Szulik are the only people at the higher level
now. Not good.
Rahul
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list