[fab] Architecture Policy.
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Wed Nov 22 07:07:26 UTC 2006
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 00:26 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:31:25 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 11:18 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Have you *READ* the proposal?
> >
> > Of course I've read the proposal. Have _you_ actually tried dealing with
> > Extras package-monkeys recently; trying to get them to fix a problem in
> > their packages which is even slightly outside their own use case?
>
> Does this refer to just https://bugzilla.redhat.com/208774 or would you
> like to provide more examples?
I didn't have that specific bug in mind, no.
If feel that to provide specific examples of 'package-monkey' behaviour
_would_ be impolite to the individuals concerned -- regardless of the
terminology I use; I'd be saying "I'm concerned by the quality of
maintenance from people like $foo; we need to make sure we keep them in
order and not let them find any extra excuses not to maintain their
package properly."
I merely expressed concern at the _possibility_ that this might happen,
and I seem to have been assured that it won't be allowed to happen. So
that's good.
--
dwmw2
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list