Fedora account restrictions

[Brian Pepple]

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Any possible benefit from anonymous contributors is vastly outweighed by
> the restrictions we'd have to make in the infrastructure group.
> 
> The CLA is a legal document, providing accountability to Fedora and Red
> Hat. We need a real, legal name for that document, and I don't think we
> should even attempt to guarantee anonymity for anyone.
> 
> It goes against the spirit of Open Source, which is the spirit of
> Fedora.

+1

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20080121/91796dc4/attachment.bin