Planet Fedora guidelines?

[Robyn Bergeron]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:57 PM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta at gmail.com) said:
>> > 2010/6/18 Máirín Duffy <duffy at fedoraproject.org>:
>> > > Maybe adding a link to planet feeds for contact information for the
>> > > poster would be nice. And having a note somewhere that if you take issue
>> > > with a blog post's appropriateness for the planet, to use the private
>> > > contact link (which maybe takes you to a FAS login page, where you login
>> > > and then it provides the FAS public contact info for the poster) to talk
>> > > to the person.
>> >
>> > Yes, I think its quite reasonable that people provide contact
>> > information if they want to use our planet and be prepared to
>> > participate in a discussion about their content from other
>> > contributors if and when their content is deemed questionable by
>> > another contributor.
>>
>> This could certainly be automated... after all, given how the planet works
>> we can automatically tie entries to a FAS account, no?

What are the current requirements for a fedorapeople account? Is it
just CLA, or CLA +1? If it was CLA+1, I think that we are far more
likely to know that the people are actual contributors.  On the other
hand - I wonder if we know what percentage of people who are posting
to planet are CLA vs. CLA + 1 - if we have lots of people providing
good content who are only CLA, I think we run the risk of losing some
of those people, which would not be excellent.

Just curious - I don't know if doing that at all would be helpful,
useful, or anything more than me randomly brainstorming bad ideas.

-Robyn

>>
>
> yes - we can - I can probably add it in my copious free time.
>
> -sv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board