Remaining issues for the multi desktop DVD
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Jan 12 23:39:33 UTC 2011
On 1/12/11 3:38 PM, inode0 wrote:
> Just for a point of reference I have made a multi-boot CD using grub
> for years that is widely used where I work and I've not once received
> a report of it failing to boot any machine. While obviously the Fedora
> universe is larger than my universe I don't think grub is *that*
> fragile. I think in the old days stage2 of grub depended on emulating
> a floppy or hard drive which caused a lot of problems and that is no
> longer true (although there may still be problems of other sorts).
Is this grub1 or grub2? I'm not claiming that grub2 is fragile, just
that it is untested in our universe. We don't really do costly
production and high profile handouts with something that is untested.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
More information about the advisory-board