multi-desktop DVD criteria

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Sun Jan 16 22:37:38 UTC 2011


Am Samstag, den 15.01.2011, 16:10 -0600 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:51:07 +0100,
>   Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > "Must have an approved test plan on file with the Fedora Quality
> > Assurance team
> > Test plan should be written involving members of the QA team 
> > Test plan must be executed by someone, with review by a member of the QA
> > team. NB: this requires at least 2 people to participate in the testing.
> > The above must be in place in sufficient time to allow testing, and
> > remediation of uncovered issues, to occur"
> > 
> > *None* of this was is part of the spins process.
> 
> We were working on making this happen in what was left of the Spins SIG.

I know that the spins SIG is not in a good shape and I'm happy to help,
but the current meeting time does not work out for me.

> > *None* of the media we ship ATM is in that tree, see
> > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=correspondingsource.git;a=tree;f=srpmlists;hb=HEAD
> 
> This probably happened because of lost knowledge in the spins SIG. It wasn't
> documented where I knew to look and I didn't know about it. This is probably
> something that should be documented in the Spins SIG process documentation
> if we want to keep doing this going forward.

I have picked up your ticket at
https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/ticket/45 and started
committing the missing srpmlists. I will continue tomorrow when I'm home
and have reliable internet access again.

I have also added the srpmlist requirement and info how to generate them
to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process

Please tell me if it works for you.

Regards,
Christoph



More information about the advisory-board mailing list