Fedora website, Red Hat, copyright notices and FPCA

Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 02:05:26 UTC 2011


On 06/28/2011 07:30 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>>  This isn't a purely legal matter but also a matter
>> of policy since it is in the best interest of Fedora ( but not
>> necessarily Red Hat Legal's concern) to lower the barrier to entries to
>> Fedora whenever possible.
> While I agree with this, I don't think that the FPCA presents a large
> barrier to entry today.

Large or not,  any legal text is certainly a additional barrier.  it
isn't possible to deny that.  Sometimes the additional barrier is
justified and in other cases not.   Here is a question for you.   If
Fedora design team accepted any contributions licensed under CC-BY-SA
and dropped the necessity of FPCA and the warning at the top of

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_connect_to_the_design_team_sparkleshare

Do you honestly believe that we will lower the barrier to entry or
not?   I would submit that this is indeed the case and FPCA serves no
purpose here.

Rahul


More information about the advisory-board mailing list