FUDcon Board Meeting

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 01/20/2012 04:36 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:14:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 01/19/2012 12:41 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> From my POV the move in question doesn't necessarily achieve anything
>>> in the vision or further Fedora's goals.
>>
>> We disagree on that.  Point 1 and 2 in the vision requires open tools.
>>
> Since duckduckgo isn't open, are you saying that 1 and 2 are not applicable?

Is that a rhetorical question? duckduckgo is more open than google is.
for instance, a more open privacy policy

> Reading the duckduckgo faq, it seems like their main thrust is that they
> keep less information about search patterns than google.  

That's not all of it certainly.  I recommend using it for a while.  One
example.

http://duckduckgo.com/bang.html

>>
> To put in a counter -- I don't think the Board has any business trying to
> manage at all.  Lead, yes.  Manage, no.

Don't see the board doing either much

Rahul

Rahul