[Ambassadors] Ambassadors list vs. FAmSCo list
Truong Anh. Tuan
tuanta at iwayvietnam.com
Mon Dec 19 02:01:35 UTC 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christoph Wickert" <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com>
> To: "Fedora Ambassadors" <ambassadors at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:02:02 AM
> Subject: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors list vs. FAmSCo list
> Hi there,
> when I recently complained about low attendance in the first meeting
> of the newly elected FAmSCo, many people suggested to make use of
> mailing lists more often. While I do have some concerns about the
> efficiency, I fully agree that we should give it a try.
> As you also might know I was one of the people who demanded making
> FAmSCo list public readable two years ago. Now I'd like to encourage
> usage of trac for FAmSCo business and therefor we should have a list
> where all tickets from FAmSco are sent to.
> As trac is not fully public, the list we use cannot be public either.
> This makes me wonder if this was a good idea to open FAmSCo list. SO
> we have two options:
> 1. Keep FAmSCo list public, but create a famsco-private list.
> This is just like the board.
> 2. Make FAmSCo list private again and use the ambassadors list
> for all public FAmSCo discussions. This is what FESCO does.
> At this point I am not sure which proposal is better. The second one
> will make FAmSCo members use ambassadors list more often and improve
> transparency and participation, but on the other hand it will also
> increase the noise level and make things more.
> What is better? Please state your opinions!
I think the option 2 is much easier for everyone. We do not need to
subscribe to any other mailing list while we can still follow up
Actually, the current traffic is acceptable. Give a try then we can
change if needed.
More information about the ambassadors