[Ambassadors] FUDCon APAC bids
Truong Anh. Tuan
tuanta at iwayvietnam.com
Sun Jun 26 13:57:30 UTC 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joerg Simon" <jsimon at fedoraproject.org>
> To: ambassadors at lists.fedoraproject.org, "Jared K. Smith" <jsmith at fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 8:21:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ambassadors] FUDCon APAC bids
> i want to suggest to use a clearer metric to make such a important
> decission - the last decission making for FUDCon EMEA was done more on a
> subjective/feeling bases - and left some people behind with the question
> - why. Just +1 or -1 seems not enough!
> We already had a more clear decission-making in 2010 with the decission
> for the last FUDCon Panama 2011 where some concerns about Panama occured
> from other countries inside LATAM - but with some simple components to
> consider we could provide a good base for our decission - pro Panama.
> From the reports - i see the FUDCon Panama was a good Event and the
> decission right. So in the LATAM Case we could proof that the Panama Bid
> is solid enough even if they did not had the highest score - but
> combined with the subjective facts to consider the decission was
It's simply the best way to choose the right location.
> FAmSCo please provide a clear base for your vote on the FUDConBids in
> APAC! Feel free to improve the components listed in the spreadsheet by
> things like "Visa Affairs", "expected Community growth in that region"
> etc. ...
More information about the ambassadors