[Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups

[Nobrakal]

2013/10/27, H. Guémar <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your concern on that topic, off course, fedora.next would be an
> half-assed
> initiative if we forget communication and community mgmt. And i'm pretty
> sure that
> everyone here agrees with you on that point.
>
> As for myself, I also intend to represent "users" inside the Cloud WG, so

Yes, that the most important point, represent user.

> i'll be glad to
> serve as a liaison officer with both Ambassadors and Marketing groups.
> I can't speak on the behalf of cwickert, but as one of the most supportive
> member of the
> Ambassadors group, I'm confident that he'll do an outstanding job -as
> usual- on that matter

I have no doubt about cwickert and you, that sure!
But, neither email was sent on the ambassador mailing list, so, this
mail is more a reminder to not forget communication and community
management (I like your expression :) ).

@frankly3d:

>Why does the user need a middleman,
>who in this instance is a distraction.
>from his (user) talk of code to a dev also code.

Users don't need a middle man, yes. But, during the event, some people
talk to you about problem, or others things in the project.
Ambassadors is just a link. As hguemar has said, we musn't forget
communicaton people

>
> best regards,
> H.
>