[fedora-arm] F13 glibc patches for ARM?

[Peter Robinson]

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan at bobich.net> wrote:

>  On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:42:19 +0100, Peter Robinson
>  <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gordan Bobic  wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >
> >   Are the patches for F13 glibc to make it work on ARM available
> >   somewhere? I noticed that F13-ARM ships with 2.12-4, but primary
> > F13
> >   ships with 2.12-1 which was updated to 2.12.2-1. Where are the
> > patches
> >   from 2.12-1 to 2.12-4 for ARM? I found this page:
> >
> >
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Packages_needing_patching
> > [2]
> >   but it only lists F12 packages, the F13 section is empty.
> >
> >   The reason I'm asking is because I'm building RHEL6 for ARM, and
> > glibc
> >   is one off the packages that don't build. Build fails with armv5tel
> > not
> >   supported. I can see in the F13 spec file that the only arm
> > specific
> >   patch applied is tzupdate2.patch, with a couple of ARM specific
> > compile
> >   options and suchlike, I just wanted to make sure there is nothing
> > else
> >   I'm missing.
> >
> > In the srpm?
>
>  Yes, as I said, I saw the spec file in the srpm, and the only thing I
>  can see there is the tzupdate2.patch, but that doesn't explain the gap
>  between 2.12-1 and 2.12-4. My concern is that there may be ARM specific
>  fixes between those versions, and primary F13 never appears to have
>  shipped with 2.12-4.
>
>
It is basically just that, possibly some changes to the spec file itself as
well from memory when I looked at it. diffing against mainline will tell you
that. The fixes for F-13 weren't accepted upstream, the ones for F-14 were
less bad but I think F-15 will have something that's acceptable to upstream.


Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/attachments/20110805/c3895bd8/attachment.html