Packaging of noVNC and Websockets
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Apr 26 07:59:10 UTC 2012
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:39:05PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 04:08:41 PM Adam Young wrote:
> > It looks like a couple of projects are interested in using the noVNC
> > viewer as a way of talking to machines from a web browser. I've made a
> > first stab at packageing them, and, in doing so, learned a little bit.
> >
> > The noVNC code is designed around a proxy that, under the Debian deploy,
> > lives in /usr/share/noVNC/utils/. This directory contains shell
> > scripts, a shared object complete with Makefile, and lots of python
> > code. Needless to say, it does not match Fedora packaging standards.
>
> Hello,
>
> OpenNebula optionally uses noVNC but it downloads it with a script to /tmp
> and creates a symlink to /usr/share/one/noVNC vs packaging it. So I wonder how
> this would work in packaging.
Well OpenNebula would just need to be changed to note download anything
if it finds it already installed in /usr/bin
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the cloud
mailing list