Packaging of noVNC and Websockets

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Thu Apr 26 07:59:10 UTC 2012


On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:39:05PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 04:08:41 PM Adam Young wrote:
> > It looks like a couple of projects are interested in using the noVNC
> > viewer as a way of talking to machines from a web browser.  I've made a
> > first stab at packageing them, and, in doing so,  learned a little bit.
> > 
> > The noVNC code is designed around a proxy that, under the Debian deploy,
> > lives in /usr/share/noVNC/utils/.  This directory contains shell
> > scripts, a shared object complete with Makefile, and lots of python
> > code.  Needless to say, it does not match Fedora packaging standards.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> OpenNebula optionally uses noVNC but it downloads it with a script  to /tmp 
> and creates a symlink to /usr/share/one/noVNC vs packaging it. So I wonder how 
> this would work in packaging.

Well OpenNebula would just need to be changed to note download anything
if it finds it already installed in /usr/bin


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



More information about the cloud mailing list