OpenNebula approved

Shawn Starr shawn.starr at rogers.com
Sat Jan 7 00:59:51 UTC 2012


On Thursday, January 05, 2012 02:30:02 PM Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 06:29 PM, Jaime Melis wrote:
> > Hello Denis,
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for your help, it definitely cleared things up, and
> > happily the process is simpler than what I though it would be, which
> > is nice.
> > 
> > We've made the feature ready for wrangler.
> 
> Cool, I will take a look at it and send it over to FESCo for approval if
> it looks good. :)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Robyn

Thanks Robyn, If there's stuff missing let me and Jaime know and I'll fix it 
accordingly.

> 
> > Thanks again,
> > Jaime
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Denis Arnaud
> > 
> > <denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org <mailto:denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org>> wrote:
> >     Dear Jaime,
> >     
> >         We're a few weeks away from F17 features submission deadline
> >         and we've been working hard (especially Shaw Starr - CC) in
> >         submitting OpenNebula package dependencies. OpenNebula would
> >         even work without those not yet complete dependencies since
> >         they're mostly ruby gems which speed up OpenNebula (although
> >         we're confident they will all be there for the submission
> >         deadline), so we would like to move on to the next stage and
> >         start submitting OpenNebula for feature review to get it
> >         approved. Could anyone help us out with the process we must
> >         follow to get OpenNebula to be an accepted feature?
> >     
> >     AFAIU, you can submit the feature for approval by Fesco. There
> >     should be a Fesco meeting tonight, I believe. As a reminder, the
> >     feature process is described on the Fedora Wiki:
> >     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy. In particular, the
> >     acceptance criteria
> >     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Acceptance) seem
> >     all be met by OpenNebula.
> >     All the tasks of the feature are not required to be completed for
> >     the feature approval. Rather, they need to be completed for the
> >     Fedora 17 freeze (which will come shortly).
> >     
> >     So, regarding the acceptance process, the only thing you have to
> >     do *for now*
> >     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Milestones), is:
> >     "1. The Feature Owner adds the feature page to
> >     Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler
> >     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler>
> >     by adding the following text to the bottom of their feature page:
> >     *Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler
> >     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler>*--it
> >     is already in the feature template
> >     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EmptyTemplate>."
> >     
> >     Note that you can also refer to the features submitted by similar
> >     projects: OpenStack
> >     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenStack),
> >     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Aeolus_Conductor),
> >     Sheepdog (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sheepdog) and
> >     HekaFS (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HekaFS) for Fedora
> >     16, as well as BoxGrinder
> >     (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BoxGrinder) for Fedora 15.
> >     
> >     Does it seem clearer?
> >     
> >     Best regards
> >     
> >     Denis
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cloud mailing list
> > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud



More information about the cloud mailing list