Cloud WG proposed new slate [was: cloud wg official membership refresh?]

[Haïkel]

2014-09-29 16:16 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>:
>
> Okay, so, I went through the IRC logs, e-mail archives,
> https://github.com/fedora-cloud/, and tickets. I identified this last of the
> the most active cloud SIG members, and I think that the voting WG membership
> should reflect this. This ends up dropping quite a few of the active
> members, which I think is okay -- it's not a black mark or anything. We've
> been operating very well with a blurred line and now formal distinction, and
> this is just meant to bring the list into sync with activity.
>
> If you're on this list but feel like you shouldn't be, speak up. (If, for
> example, you're really not going to have time over the *next* three months.)
> And if you aren't but think you really should be, just say so -- in private
> or here or whatever -- I'm not meaning to leave out anyone who is actively
> involved and I easily could have missed relevant activity not represented by
> the sources above (and also, I haven't had much coffee yet this morning.)
>
> So, proposed new slate:
>
> * Andy Grimm (agrimm)
> * Dusty Mabe (dustymabe)
> * Ian McLeod (imcleod)
> * Jared Smith (jsmith)
> * Joe Brockmeier (jzb)
> * Haïkel Guémar (number80)
> * David Gay (oddshocks)
> * Mike Ruckmman (roshi)
> * Scott Collier (scollier)
>
> (Why yes, that is in alphabetical order by IRC nick.)
>

Just to speak about the other people that are not me, they are all
worthy to join the WG.
I'm particularly excited to have representatives from doc & QA which
will be important topics
in the next releases.
Products without documentation and QA are not really products, no
matter how great they are ;-)

> You'll notice I left _myself_ off. That's not because of not caring, but
> because of that "not having time over the next few months" thing — I really
> need to focus on FPL duties. And, it's also because Red Hat is in the
> process of hiring someone to replace my old role focusing on Fedora Cloud.
> I'm not going to name names until the ink is dry, but it's someone who will
> have no trouble jumping into the mix on merit in short order. (I'm also
> really not concerned about number of members, by the way -- I think we
> shouldn't make 9 a magic number and adjust up and down based on activity.)
>

*nods*
I'd like to thank you for your good services in the Cloud SIG then
Cloud WG, you did great :)

And I assume that everyone else wants the WG to remain open to any
Cloud SIG member.
Since we're using lazy consensus, as long as we keep membership at a
reasonable level,
it's not a problem to add few members.

Regards,
H.

>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct