dnf migration period

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 03/13/2015 03:05 PM, David Gay wrote:
> I don't see a problem with keeping both installed alongside each other
> for now, as long as people are aware that they *need* to migrate to dnf.
> We don't want a Python 2 -> 3 "migration period". :P

One release cycle should do it.

Ideally we would have messaged this very loudly last release cycle. I
feel like I dropped the ball a bit not making it a core part of the
release announcement.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20150313/31505401/attachment.sig>