Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 09/11/2015 11:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Since VirtualBox is the format the vast majority of Vagrant users will
> want, that's... kind of a big deal. *sigh* Options I can see here are:
> 
> A) Scramble to find some way to do the VirtualBox testing.
> 
> B) Don't publish the VirtualBox images.
> 
> C) Publish the VirtualBox images, but put them in a Penalty Box with
>    extra warnings
> 
> Any other ideas? Preferences? B seems the most responsible, yet also
> the most sad. A would be highly unusual for our infrastructure. C could
> expose us to looking bad if support breaks and no one notices.

Is there a way we can test it out-of-band? I'm willing to do some manual
testing as needed at least until we can come up with a longer term fix.

A and/or C seem like the most useful options. B would be, as you say, sad.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20150911/7318087d/attachment.sig>