[fab] Fedora Project and Hosting
seth vidal
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Fri Oct 20 14:20:45 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:12 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 20 October 2006 10:02, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > So people have been asking more and more for general VCS space,
> > sometimes SVN, GIT, CVS. My question for the board: Is the Fedora
> > Project a place to host this stuff or should we just point them to
> > freshmeat and sourceforge? Here's an example thats comes up:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/tickets/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&Tic
> >ketID=102
> >
> > and another
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/tickets/customer.pl?Action=CustomerTicketZo
> >om&TicketID=94
> >
> > At present there is no formal policy (that I am aware of).
>
> So some will say use 108, but others will say that 108 doesn't support the SCM
> of their choice. There are some projects, things that are written
> specifically for Fedora and Fedora based distributions (like RHEL) that may
> want to develop out in the public space, with the SCM of their choice.
> Sending those people to sourceforge is not a very good solution, as I
> wouldn't wish sourceforge on anybody's project. I suppose if we want the
> Fedora project to foster software development, and become that 'open source
> lab' that I keep hearing about, we probably should try to provide some
> infrastructure for these projects. However it is a pretty big undertaking to
> try and provide something complete, repo, mailing list, webspace, bug
> tracking system, etc.. in such a way that we can easily add and segregate
> projects.
>
I won't say use 108 b/c:
1. 108 is not open source
2. 108 is not a fedora project at all
3. 108 requires YET ANOTHER ACCOUNT.
just my thoughts.
-sv
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list