governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Jesse Keating]

On Friday 08 June 2007 13:57:18 Axel Thimm wrote:
> Doesn't that short-cirquit fesco out of the loop? E.g. if fesco is
> supposed to be overseeing those two teams it sounds like
>
> a) board decides on Halloween/May Day ETA
> b) fesco interacts with feature/releng teams and lays out a plan to
>    fulfill the board's input.
> c) fesco presents to the board the results, e.g. whether this is
>    possible and what the constraining parameters will be (which
>    features will make it etc)
>
> If this is considered too much hierarchical procedure then these two
> teams need to be attached to the board directly.

I overlooked this myself.  IMHO the release team and feature team and QA team 
should present their thoughts/desires to FESCo to decide on the schedule 
and -that- would be presented to the board for final sign off.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070608/d702b7ec/attachment.bin