governance, fesco, board, etc.

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Tue Jun 12 09:13:55 UTC 2007


Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> 
> RH "dark chamber" decisions in many cases first take effect, and are
> never discussed nor voted on. They are "divine", except for some rare
> occasions when one or more of these "divine creatures" has the grace to
> listen.
> 
> ATM, I am seeing @RH's (esp. rel-eng) drawing arguable RH-centric
> decisions, which I consider to be spoiling large parts of the basis the
> former FE's success was based on.

If you want things to improve you can't be throwing vague accusations. 
Rel Eng has non-RH members in it and can potentially accommodate more if 
they volunteer.

>> But that's how the board will work, 4 people get elected (community)
>> and 5 appointed from RH. You get the mix you mention.
> Well, I must have missed this. 

It has been that way right from the start and several people have told 
you this in discussions before on and offlist.

Rahul




More information about the advisory-board mailing list