governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > 
> > RH "dark chamber" decisions in many cases first take effect, and are
> > never discussed nor voted on. They are "divine", except for some rare
> > occasions when one or more of these "divine creatures" has the grace to
> > listen.
> > 
> > ATM, I am seeing @RH's (esp. rel-eng) drawing arguable RH-centric
> > decisions, which I consider to be spoiling large parts of the basis the
> > former FE's success was based on.
> 
> If you want things to improve you can't be throwing vague accusations. 
> Rel Eng has non-RH members in it and can potentially accommodate more if 
> they volunteer.
OK, in verbose: 

rel-eng has broken FE's workflow model into something I consider
counter-productive and unusable to community contributors. 

rel-eng's deeds are throwing away all the points having made FE
attractive.

>> But that's how the board will work, 4 people get elected (community)
>>> and 5 appointed from RH. You get the mix you mention.
>> Well, I must have missed this. 
>
>It has been that way right from the start and several people have told 
> you this in discussions before on and 
It's answers like these which lets appear Fedora-leadership at RH as they
currently are perceived.

> offlist.
Nobody did.

Ralf