governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 10:15 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:37 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >>> For me, they increasingly diverge, I meanwhile consider the
> >>> side-effects of the merger as obstacle.
> >> Which side-effects?
> > koji, bodhi, rel-eng, fedora-testing...
> 
> <imho>
> Those are some really bad examples.  In contrast, I consider koji, 
> bodhi, rel-eng, fedora-testing as shining examples of things done right: 
> open dialog, open procedures, and open software solving difficult issues.
> </imho>
IMO, 

* bodhi, koji are immature, semi-functional, semi-cooked pieces of SW
which still have to prove their longevity, but so far don't do anything
but introducing bureaucracy and are almost strangling former FE.

* rel-eng could have done much better.

* fedora-testing is a nothing but a hoax close blinding yourself about
QA - I consider it to be a dead born child. The best I can say about it
is it causing delays in updates.

Ralf