better documentation

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 12.06.2007 18:55, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:32 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 12.06.2007 18:10, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> * bodhi, koji are immature, semi-functional, semi-cooked pieces of SW
>>>> which still have to prove their longevity, but so far don't do anything
>>>> but introducing bureaucracy and are almost strangling former FE.
>>> But "good enough" to get the job done *now*.
>>> Could you provide constructive suggestions(1) on how to make things better?
>> Better documentation. A step by step guide: "how to update a Fedora
>> package for dummies after the merge" or "The way of a package update:
>> from cvs commit over koji and bodi into the proper repo". Linked on
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers please.
> 
> Yes, this needs to happen.  I've put it on the schedule for this week's
> FESCo meeting to discuss and hopefully find a volunteer other than
> myself to do the writing, but if no one else does, I'll do it.  Because
> you're right, this is sorely needed and we're past the crunch which kept
> us from doing it from the get-go

Thanks Jeremy.

CU
thl