Fedora vision & more specific goals

[Bill Nottingham]

Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger at gmail.com) said: 
> > 2) A formal charter of some sort is needed because what we have as a
> > wiki and some documents does not scale for larger than 60-120 people.
> > After that size some human brain automatically makes some other person
> > a non-entity at some point in the conversation and people have no idea
> > where they stand. It doesn't matter if the people know and work next
> > to each other.. once their brains start taking in the fact that their
> > overall group is larger than X (where X is some built in variable per
> > human brain) they require more formalized rules.
> > 
> > Basically, people who want less rules and bureaucracy can only get
> > away with it in smaller groups. At some size we don't scale complexity
> > linearly any more and it all goes to hell. [Humans suck for community
> > building.. but they won't fund my T7000 project to replace them.]
> > 
> I could definitely go for this.  it is though, rather than a bi-yearly
> meeting, an in depth FAD on Governance.  So I still don't know that we
> should arbitrarily say that we should meet every six months but this sounds
> like a good topic to hold a FAD on.

I would be concerned that a FAD that brings together the majority of
Board, FESCo, and FAMSCo members may be more cost proihibitive than most FADs.
But I suspect that it could be justified.

How much representation of the groups do we have signed up @ FUDCon?

Bill