Request: please consider clarifying the project's position on Spins

[giallu at gmail.com]

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> I think we can keep in mind the 'do we prioritize some spins' discussion
> here too. Requiring artwork group to create/help create artwork for
> every spin there is (especially given that that set can theoretically be
> arbitrarily large)? Not a good idea, no. :) Requiring artwork for, say,
> four primary spins? More plausible. You may still think it's a bad idea
> - I just wanted to point out that the possibility of prioritizing a
> small subset of spins has implications here.

Maybe we could decide to avoid re-doing the whole artwork at each
release, at least for some items, so there is less work overall.


-- 
Gianluca Sforna

http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu