Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:56:56 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:

...snip...

> > The Code of Conduct is not a legal document, but I do think there is
> > value in establishing a conscious understanding on the part of the
> > contributor that there is an expectation that they must either
> > follow the COC or face the consequences (which include, but are not
> > limited to, removal from the Fedora Community).
> 
> Could you clarify a bit what other action can be taken?

Well, we specifically didn't want to list everything as that would lead
to a 'but you didn't say foobar' type of response. 

All kinds of things could be included here, such as (but not at all
limited to): 

* setting moderation on someone on a mailing list (requiring a
  moderator to approve posts). 
* removing someone from a list. 
* banning someone from an irc channel. 
* quieting them in an irc channel. 
* kicking them from an irc channel. 
* removing things like Fedora irc cloaks. 
* removing things like fas group memberships.
* removing or reassigning package permissions. 
* banning or removing access for networks/ips/etc. 

In an ideal world we would never need to do any of these. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20110306/7f5978d8/attachment-0001.bin