Board/Project Governance

[Robert Mayr]

2013/9/11 Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com>:
> The overall lack of commenting really kind of baffles me still.  Now I
> can't tell if it's simply apathy, "silence means agreement", or some
> kind of boycott.
> josh


Hi Josh,
when I read your proposal I said 'yes, that's a good idea' and I still
agree with all you wrote in your mail.
Having representatives of every group in the Board could help to let
the teams work easier together, and we'd have the guarantee to have
every single group within the Board to discuss also specific issues.
On the other hand most of the Board members actually would remain on
their seat (as you pointed out), so we are already doing well with the
nominations/elections process. Changing the process therefore wouldn't
revolutionize the Board members, but we would have for sure a better
definition of how to compose the Board also in the future.
Just my two cents in this discussion.
Greetings.

-- 
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)