Board/Project Governance

[Josh Boyer]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:28:30 -0400,
>   Robyn Bergeron <rbergero at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I suppose I may putting the cart before the horse here, so to speak, but
>> was just thinking about the prospect of the following:
>> (a) Coordination of additional elections by whichever teams elect to do so
>> (b) If they are uncoordinated and more or less ad-hoc (everyone on
>> different schedules) - if the election announcements would be endless, cause
>> difficulty in (re)scheduling meetings, etc.
>> (c) In either an uncoordinated case or a coordinated case - if that winds
>> up being a lot more on the election coordinator's plate
>
>
> I would expect any team elections to be fairly informal, sort of how teams
> might elect their chairman. I would expect only team members would be doing
> the voting for most of those groups and these could be done in a regular
> team meeting.

Yes, this is also what I was thinking.  I'm not sure why a team with a
limited number of people would choose to do a full Election run for
this appointee.  Seems like major overkill for groups that only have
7-9 members that can vote.

josh