fudcon bid process

[Ankur Sinha]

On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:51 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> (Overall, the basic process looks solid, and the 2010 goals still seem
> correct.)

If the FUDCon process is under review, could the FAD process be looked
at too? It also mentions that the FPL needs to approve a FAD and so on. 

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_organize_a_FAD

The FUDCon process is a lot better documented - it has a suggested
timeline and so on. The FAD page has none of this and has lead to some
confusion in the past. 
-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/council-discuss/attachments/20150311/bc1dfc6d/attachment.sig>