Starting point for package list for Fedora 7 Desktop spin
davej at redhat.com
Sun Jan 28 18:22:04 UTC 2007
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:44:38PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> This is a first rough draft at what packages to include in the Desktop spin.
> <core> (not visible)
Is this really vital for core? If a chipset isn't auto-enabling DMA these days,
it's a kernel bug that really should be fixed. And I can't think of
any other must-have reasons for hdparm.
> <base> (visible)
belongs in a 'development' group or the like, but there doesn't
seem to be one. Hmm? I'd put this wherever binutils/gdb/gcc are,
which doesn't seem to be 'base'.
This should be dropped. The kernel bits haven't been present for
some time now.
> gnome-power-manager (does this go with Desktop instead?)
I'd say yes today, given the absense of a system wide power daemon.
Should be core. This is as important as say, fsck.
When this list says 'visible' does that mean "offered as a choice in package set" ?
Anaconda has the knowledge to know whether or not it will need this post-boot
so this shouldn't need to be asked about.
More information about the desktop