Workstation PRD approval

Mon Dec 9 13:56:37 UTC 2013

Or you could assume that it is included in the developer usecase, because focusing on the developer usecase in a way that makes no developer want to use the system is actually the opposite of focusing on the developer usecase.

Christian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Garrett" <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" <desktop at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 2:53:18 PM
Subject: Re: Workstation PRD approval

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:51:13AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
> Ok, so looking over this it seems the primary change you made was replace the use cases, with the first use case being 'general user'? Is that truly useful usecase to call out? Prioritizing something to target 'everyone' isn't really prioritization at all.

Yes, it's a vital use case to call out, because it covers the set of 
behaviour that almost everyone who uses the Workstation product will 
require. If we concentrate on improving the developer experience to the 
exclusion of caring about the general user case, no developers are 
actually going to bother with Fedora. They'll just use OS X instead, 
because it'll be a nicer desktop OS and almost as good a development 
environment.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop