Underlying DE for the Workstation product

[Richard Hughes]

On 1 February 2014 22:22, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> gummiboot really isn't suitable as a Fedora bootloader. Its inability to
> read non-FAT filesystems is an absolute showstopper, as is its reliance
> on LoadImage()/ExecuteImage() for starting the kernel.

Hi, I'm somewhat of a UEFI newbie; could you elaborate a little why
non-FAT is required and why LoadImage() is a bad thing?

Thanks,

Richard.