KDE integration/status for Workstation

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA:
> 
> I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora KDE
> are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they will see
> as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE on top of it.
> I think this will be fine for some folks, but there'll be a
> significant constituency which just wants a KDE image.
> 
> In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can see
> both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the Workstation
> product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely legitimate and
> viable constituencies, which sort of means we've just created a
> bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure I see a clever
> magical solution to that, though. Engage brain cells...
> 

I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE is
release-blocking *as an optional component atop the Workstation*.

For the constituency that wants a pristine KDE environment, they may
choose to maintain their own spin, but *that spin* should be removed
from the Fedora QA's matrix. (Fedora QA should focus on the
Workstation add-on). The KDE SIG likely has its own sufficient
resources for testing their pure-KDE spin.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlMXKy0ACgkQeiVVYja6o6PHDgCfdFDdJts9R579dFDwLPzTT8Ie
fYAAniwK+5x9Gk2AfzZVMZNasXa4A9iy
=/GZX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----