self introduction

[kendell clark]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


hi
Sounds good. I'll take a look. I'm also about to begin work on the
accessibility guide, most of which needs to be rewritten,
accessibility is much easier than it was back in 2011. I'm still not
able to log in to FAS, last I heard someone had contacted fedora admin
for my initial password, but no word back yet. I have to say, I find
fedora a really pleasant OS, not only in terms of the software it has,
which is all I need, but also in the community. The irc channels are
very helpful, and I've learned a lot so far. There are some rather
serious bugs in the upcoming gnome 3.16, and I'm not sure where to go
to report them. The #gnome and #gnome-a11y channels in irc.gnome.org
seem to be dead, not many people respond to queeries. In particular,
gdm seems to be inaccessible in 3.16. I'm almost positive this is
because it's using wayland by default, and there's some strange issue
with wayland that keeps orca from being able to read the window. If it
were to fall back to x, or the wayland issue were to be fixed it would
work fine. There are lots of unlabeled buttons in gnome's user
interface, mostly in the control center modules. There are also
duplicate buttons, in the power and notifications parts of control
center. And this is probably way off topic, just thought I'd bring it
up here. I'm unable to file a bug yet until I get my password.
Thanks
Kendell clark
Sent from Fedora 21 GNU/Linux

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:57:36AM -0500, kendell clark wrote:
>> I've created a #fedora-accessibility channel and am currently
>> idling in there. I also regularly appear in both #fedora-users
>> and #fedora-docs. My accessibility feedback is mostly about
>> gnome, but
> 
> Hi Kendell! Welcome, and thank you for working on this. You might
> be interested in taking a look at 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Usability which is the Fedora
> Usability SIG, and which describes itself as including
> accessibility. Unfortunately, it appears to be defunct; perhaps a
> revival is in order?
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=m9HE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----