Darktable Copr

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:45 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Okay, so from what I understand thus far then:
> 
> 1) If I upgrade to F23, I will either be left with F22 darktable and
> get 
> confused/frustrated when I try to upgrade it (eg when a new feature 
> comes out tha tI want,) or I will be left with a system that I
> cannot 
> upgrade at all (still an open question as to how obvious the
> workaround 
> of removing darktable would be?)
> 

That sums it up, yes.


> 2) The Design Suite is going to either (a) drop darktable (b) be
> dropped 
> itself (c) massively overhauled to become a Fedora Remix.
> 

I haven't been involved with any conversations with that SIG.


> 3) Still don't understand the F23 experience of installing darktable.
> 
> In terms of user experience, this simply sucks and makes me feel
> like 
> slavish adherence to obscure packaging rules is more important than
> our 
> user base.
> 


I couldn't agree more[1].


[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-September/2142
62.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20150910/0d669951/attachment.sig>