AMD 64 support
Jeremy Portzer
jeremyp at pobox.com
Wed Nov 5 14:10:32 UTC 2003
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 06:48, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >We may even want a new fedora-amd64-devel at fedora.redhat.com
> >mailing list for the cause. Actually it might be nice if a
> >fedora-<arch>-devel mailing list were created for each
> >architecture the Fedora community deems worthy.
>
> Personally I'm on about 130 mailing lists. I really don't need
> another one. People are too quick to create new mailing lists
> nowadays unnecessarily. All 3 existing fedora lists are for the
> most part identical off topic clones of each other, and a new
> list would probably just add a 4th clone list. fedora-devel-list
> is the best place to have these discussions and hit everyone in
> one spot. If the volume of per arch discussion really grows to
> the size that it warrants another mailing list then that is
> something to consider, but doing it prematurely is just
> personally an annoyance at least to me. Others may feel
> differently of course.
FWIW, there already is a list for AMD64 discussion, though it seems to
get only a limited amount of traffic.
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
This was created for the "GinGin64" technology preview, which was a sort
of "alpha" prior to the Taroon beta for RHEL 3, but it could be used for
generic RHL/Fedora discussion for AMD64.
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp at pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20031105/e5a9d0cf/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list