Regarding Extras package announcements
toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Wed Sep 22 15:55:06 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:21, Nils O. Selåsdal wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 12:30, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > If it could be automated, that would be very good, e.g. like "rawhide
> > report". So far, not every packager has posted announcements. The
> > list archives cover maybe 50% of the published packages and updates.
> > Maybe even less.
> imho this should be automated. Most people just use fedora-pkgannfmt
> anyway, which could probably just be run as the bult packages are copied
> to their respective directories !?
The build system would also need (Well... should) also figure out which
changelogs are new since the last package release like the RH Build
System Reports. Shouldn't be too hard if the changelog header lines are
correctly formatted (QA should be catching that.)
t o s h i o + t i k i - l o u n g e . c o m
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040922/1f7a44a8/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel