Fedora Core 5 Idea

[Ovidiu Lixandru]

Emmanuel Seyman wrote:

> And the fact that Bluecurve was the default for RH8 -> FC3 doesn't
> mean it has to be the default till the end of time. Your arguement
> doesn't stand either.

Did I say it has to be BlueCurve? Did I say it has to be any artwork 
"borrowed" from RHEL? I said it should be something professional. 
BlueCurve was and still is in this regard. AFAIK BlueCurve is the *only* 
complete desktop package for GNOME and KDE. It's got 
Qt/GTK1/GTK2/Metacity/KWM themes, icons, wallpapers and mouse pointers 
for both environments. Clearlooks may be a "rewrite", but it's a 5% 
rewrite. There can't be any comparison between the two.

> I too think that binary drivers are a waste of developers' time.

Why should you care, is it FC's developers' time? Are they cr*p? Have a 
look at ATI's, thank you.

-- 
Ovidiu Lixandru
linux360
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5653 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050701/476171e4/attachment-0002.bin