Xorg 1.5 missed the train?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Wed May 21 18:24:08 UTC 2008
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> said:
>> That has nothing to do with what I said. I'm suggesting that fedora
>> should ship with interfaces that are publicized as standard, and allow
>> time for changes in this standard to propagate before shipping something
>> different from the standard.
>
> The Fedora and X developers did publicize the change several months ago.
> The X.org code has been available for testing, and Fedora has had
> several test releases with the code integrated.
I thought someone said it was only a week or so ago that the ABI was
even internally/informally pronounced as stable.
>
> What more do you expect? Do they have to take out an ad in the New York
> Times or send certified snail mail to nVidia?
Just naming it 1.5 would probably have been sufficient per the nVidia
forum posting about targeting the release.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the devel
mailing list