PLEASE READ: provenpackager reseed
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Tue Mar 10 22:05:46 UTC 2009
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 06:04:38PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:37:29AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > >
> > There was a meeting at one point (I think FESCo but I could be wrong)
> > where the cvsadmin groups was given responsibility for putting new
> > members in cvsadmin. I believe that this technically covers all the
> > groups except secondary arches -- who have the same powers but different
> > groups and different responsibilities.
> >
> > Just pointing out the history; not necessarily what should be.
>
> It is somehow odd to have a complex trust system with many levels
> of control (roughly packager -> provenpackager -> sponsor) for
> contributors that have less power, while there is no apparent
> control/procedure for the cvsadmin group. At least people having
> cvsadmin powers granted should be provenpackagers, and maybe
> cvsadmin members could be identified and something about them
> could be added in the policies pages, be it only a mention to an
> informal process to become cvsadmin.
To answer to myself, now that I stand corrected, cvsadmin is outside
of the packager trust system, and in the infras trust system, so it is
right as is (more precisely I don't have an opinion on it).
--
Pat
More information about the devel
mailing list