systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Adam Jackson]

On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > BOOTUP
> > - System boots successfully to GUI, when configured.
> > - System boots successfully to text mode, when configured.
> > - System properly handles being passed [1-5], 'single', 'S', 's', '-s',
> >   booting to the appropriate 'runlevel' (0 and 6 can still work,
> >   but they're sort of pointless anyway) When booted in this manner,
> >   '5' will bring up a GUI, and '3' will not.
> 
> You mean 'being passed on the kernel cmdline', I assume ?
> Do we consider interactive boot essential (I think not) ?
> Should mention something about forced fsck, maybe.
> What about selinux relabeling ?

I can't remember interactive boot ever working.

> > PLYMOUTH
> > - plymouth is shown on startup.
> > - plymouth is quit correctly.
> > - plymouth is shown on shutdown.
> > - 'esc' to show details still functions in plymouth.
> > - an equivalent to /var/log/boot.log still exists, and is populated
> >   (can be normal syslog)
> > - plymouth transition from grub -> boot -> X is seamless for KMS cards,
> >   similar to Fedora 13.
> 
> Note that this is currently broken (somewhere in X, not systemd's fault
> at all).

Depends on the driver, but yeah.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100824/d106e0b3/attachment.bin