systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:00 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > BOOTUP
> > > - System boots successfully to GUI, when configured.
> > > - System boots successfully to text mode, when configured.
> > > - System properly handles being passed [1-5], 'single', 'S', 's', '-s',
> > >   booting to the appropriate 'runlevel' (0 and 6 can still work,
> > >   but they're sort of pointless anyway) When booted in this manner,
> > >   '5' will bring up a GUI, and '3' will not.
> > 
> > You mean 'being passed on the kernel cmdline', I assume ?
> > Do we consider interactive boot essential (I think not) ?
> > Should mention something about forced fsck, maybe.
> > What about selinux relabeling ?
> 
> I can't remember interactive boot ever working.

It always worked for me - and it saved my arse a number of times when a
service starting up would go haywire and hang the system.


I know it worked in rhel4 and rhel5 - so circa: fedora 3 and fedora 6 at
the very least.


-sv